The Comparative of Growth Characteristics and Ginsenoside Contents in Wild-simulated Ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) on Different Years by Soil Properties of Cultivation Regions

Kiyoon Kim; Jeong-Hoon Huh; Yurry Um; Kwon Seok Jeon; Hyun-Jun Kim

doi:10.7732/kjpr.2020.33.6.651

Preview

Research Article

Korean Journal of Plant Resources. 1 December 2020. 651-658
https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2020.33.6.651

The Comparative of Growth Characteristics and Ginsenoside Contents in Wild-simulated Ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) on Different Years by Soil Properties of Cultivation Regions

Kiyoon Kim¹

Jeong-Hoon Huh²

Yurry Um³

Kwon Seok Jeon⁴

Hyun-Jun Kim³^†

¹Post-doc, Forest Medicinal Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Yeongju 36040, Korea

²The Master’s Degree Researcher, Forest Medicinal Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Yeongju 36040, Korea

³Researcher, Forest Medicinal Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Yeongju 36040, Korea

⁴Senior Researcher, Forest Medicinal Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Yeongju 36040, Korea

^*mind4938@korea.kr

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative growth characteristics and ginenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng on different years (7 and 13-year-old) by monitoring soil properties of cultivation regions. Plant and soil samples were collected from 6 different cultivation regions. Soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN) and cation exchangeable capacity (CEC) were significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng cultivation regions compared to 7-year-old wild-simulated ginseng cultivation regions. Growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng had shown significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng compared to 7-year-old wild-simulated ginseng. Ginsenoside G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1 were significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng than 7-year-old wild-simulated ginseng. According to the results of correlation analysis, soil OM, TN and CEC of the cultivated regions were positively correlated with the growth of wild-simulated ginseng. In addition, the root length of wild-simulated ginseng showed positive correlation with ginsenoside content. Hence, this study was able to investigate the correlation between growth and ginsenoside content of wild-simulated ginseng based on soil characteristics of the cultivation regions.

Keywords

Ginsenoside

Growth characteristics

Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer

Soil properties

Wild-simulated ginseng

MAIN

Introduction
Materials and Methods
Plant materials
Soil analysis
Morphology
Ginsenoside analysis
Statistical analysis
Results and Discussion
Soil properties
Morphological characteristics
Ginsenoside contents
Correlation between soil properties and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng
Correlation between growth characteristics and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng

Introduction

Wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer), belonging to Araliaceae, has been defined as a ginseng propagated in forest without the use of any artificial facilities such as light barriers from the Korea Forest Service (KOFPI, 2013). Additionally, wild-simulated ginseng is managed by the Korea Forest Service by selection of cultivation sites, seeds, seeding, cultivation management, quality inspection, and distribution (NIFoS, 2018). Recently, consumers are highly interested in clean forest products, and wild-simulated ginseng is in great demand among many forest products (Kim et al., 2019a). Therefore, the Korea Forest Service has established ‘The Industry Development Countermeasure of Wild-simulated Ginseng’ to carry out scientific research such as standard cultivation, processing, phytochemistry and pharmacology to enhance the cultivation (KFS, 2019).

Cultivation studies of wild-simulated ginseng have been carried out based on the correlation between direct seeding, transplanting, soil properties, soil bacterial community and growth characteristics (Kim et al., 2019a; Kim et al., 2019b, 2019c). The studies on ginsenoside have been reported based on the difference between its accumulation in wild-simulated ginseng and cultivated ginseng (Jeong et al., 2019; Moon, 2015). In addition, Kim et al. (2020) reported the content of ginsenoside were significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng compare to 7-year-old wild-simulated ginseng. However, comprehensive studies of soil properties, growth characteristics, ginenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng have not been studied till date.

Hence, in this study, we aimed to investigate the comparative growth characteristics and ginenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng based on different years by monitoring soil properties of cultivation regions.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Seven and 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng samples were collected in 3 replicates according to their age from six local provinces (Pyeongchang, Yeongwol, Danyang, Munkyeong, Hamyang, Sancheong) in South Korea during July to August 2019.

Soil analysis

Soil samples were collected from 6 different cultivation regions of wild-simulated ginseng in 3 replicates according to their age (7 and 13-year-old). Surface soil was removed and soil was collected at a depth within 20 ㎝. The soil samples were passed through 2 ㎜ sieve and air-dried at room temperature. The soil physico-chemical properties analysis such as soil pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphate (Avail. P₂O₅), exchangeable cation and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were performed following standard analysis manual of the Rural Development Administration (RDA), South Korea (RDA, 2013).

Morphology

Quantitative characters of 7 and 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng such as rhizome length, root length, root diameter and dry weight were measured using digital calipers and balance (Fig. 1). The cross-section area, surface area and volume of root were measured using an EPSON scanner (Expression 12,000XL) and WinRHIZO^TM Pro software (version 2017, Regent Instruments, Canada) (Kim et al., 2019b; Wisam et al., 2018).

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2020-033-06/N0820330611/images/kjpr_33_06_11_F1.jpg

Fig. 1

Morphology characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng. (1) 7-year-old, (2) 13-year-old, (3) morphological characteristics measured in the study (1-3 were cited from Kim et al., 2020).

Ginsenoside analysis

Dried roots were pulverized with a grinder, and then sieved through a no. 80 mesh. The powdered from of 36 samples (ca. 0.2 g) were extracted with 10 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol in an ultrasonic bath (JAC-5020, KODO, Korea) for 60 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was separated, and it was defatted through a 0.2 ㎛ membrane filter unit. An aliquot of 10 μL was analyzed using HPLC with a UV detector.

Standards of ginsenosides (G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg2, Rg3, Rh1, Rh2, F2) were purchased from ChromaDex (USA). HPLC-grade acetonitrile, methanol, and distilled water were purchased from J.T.Baker (USA) (Fig. 2). Standard working solutions for HPLC-UV were prepared by diluting the stock solutions in methanol to obtain concentration range of 10, 25, 50, 100 ㎍/mL for 12 ginsenosides.

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2020-033-06/N0820330611/images/kjpr_33_06_11_F2.jpg

Fig. 2

Chemical structures of portopanaxadiol (PPT) and protopanaxatriol (PPT)-type ginsenoside (Glc: β-D-glucopyranosyl, Arp: α-L-arabinopyranosyl, Araf: α-L-arabinofuranosyl, Rha: α-L-rhamnopyranosyl).

Ginsenoside data were obtained using an Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo Dionex, USA) with a UV detector. The analytical conditions for recording chromatogram of the marker compounds were as follows: Quantitative analysis was carried out using a Inno C-18 column (4.6 × 250 ㎜, 5 ㎛, YoungjinBiochrom, Korea). The mobile phase was a binary eluent of water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with gradient conditions as follows: 0-1 min, 5% B; 1-45 min, 70% B; 45-50 min, 95% 50-55 min, 95% B; 55-57 min, 5% B; 57-60 min, 5% B; flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The detection wavelength was 210 ㎚, and the injection volume was 10 μL.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard error (S.E.). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) software for one-way ANOVA and t-test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The correlation between soil parameters, growth characteristics and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng was confirmed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 25, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).

Results and Discussion

Soil properties

The soil physico-chemical properties of 6 different cultivation regions based on the age of wild-simulated ginseng are summarized in Table 1. Soil samples were classified as sandy loam and sandy clay loam according to the soil texture. Soil pH of all cultivation regions has determinsed as acidic or slightly acidic soils, ranging from 4.73 to 5.69. Organic matter (OM), TN and CEC were significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng cultivation regions compared to 7-year-old wild-simulated ginseng cultivation regions. On the other hand, the soil sodium content showed a significantly difference, but all soil samples were non-saline soil (EC < 2.0 dS/m). Soil EC, available P₂O₅, potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) showed no significant difference according to the different ages of wild-simulated ginseng.

Table 1.

Soil chemical properties of 6 different cultivation regions according to age of wild-simulated ginseng

Cultivation
fields

Age

Soil
texture

EC^z

OM^y

TN^x

Avail.
P₂O₅^w

Exchangeable cation

CEC^v

(1:5)

(dS/m)

(%)

(㎎/㎏)

------------------- (cmol⁺/㎏) -------------------

(cmol⁺/㎏)

PC^u

Sandy loam

5.26±
0.03^ar

0.02±
0.00^b

16.8±
1.36^a

0.60±
0.06^a

61.5±
6.24^b

0.32±
0.03^a

4.78±
1.02^a

0.63±
0.14^a

0.19±
0.11^a

42.7±
3.26^a

Sandy loam

5.43±
0.09^a

0.03±
0.00^a

16.9±
0.35^a

0.65±
0.03^a

268.9±
70.4^a

0.60±
0.23^a

7.22±
0.08^a

0.70±
0.08^a

0.05±
0.00^a

40.9±
1.39^a

Sandy clay loam

5.34±
0.10^a

0.03±
0.00^a

6.45±
0.24^b

0.23±
0.01^b

11.9±
0.47^b

0.24±
0.04^a

3.02±
0.79^a

0.72±
0.16^a

0.27±
0.08^a

22.5±
1.03^b

Sandy clay loam

5.29±
0.09^a

0.04±
0.01^a

9.76±
0.86^a

0.35±
0.03^a

75.9±
7.84^a

0.18±
0.03^a

1.86±
0.46^a

0.36±
0.04^a

0.03±
0.01^b

29.3±
1.49^a

Sandy clay loam

5.61±
0.14^a

0.02±
0.00^a

3.81±
0.41^b

0.15±
0.01^b

8.6±
0.31^b

0.15±
0.0.4^b

4.70±
0.39^a

1.06±
0.02^a

0.08±
0.02^a

14.3±
1.77^a

Sandy clay loam

5.69±
0.11^a

0.02±
0.00^a

5.03±
0.13^a

0.20±
0.01^a

108.0±
24.5^a

0.31±
0.03^a

4.86±
0.55^a

0.71±
0.05^b

0.02±
0.00^b

17.8±
0.99^a

Sandy loam

5.53±
0.08^a

0.03±
0.00^a

9.2±
0.49^b

0.35±
0.01^b

115.7±
6.95^a

0.23±
0.06^a

3.65±
0.94^a

0.63±
0.19^a

0.23±
0.07^a

28.7±
0.73^a

Sandy loam

5.17±
0.04^b

0.02±
0.00^a

11.9±
0.43^a

0.43±
0.01^a

131.9±
3.80^a

0.13±
0.01^a

0.95±
0.08^b

0.23±
0.02^a

0.04±
0.01^a

31.7±
1.08^a

Sandy loam

4.77±
0.04^b

0.02±
0.00^b

9.4±
0.49^b

0.35±
0.02^b

129.3±
15.2^a

0.10±
0.01^b

0.37±
0.03^b

0.11±
0.01^a

0.11±
0.08^a

27.5±
1.11^b

Sandy loam

5.29±
0.05^a

0.05±
0.01^a

12.8±
0.21^a

0.48±
0.01^a

78.4±
13.4^a

0.30±
0.04^a

6.99±
1.53^a

1.07±
0.37^a

0.07±
0.02^a

33.5±
0.39^a

Sandy clay loam

4.75±
0.09^a

0.02±
0.00^a

3.29±
1.05^b

0.14±
0.03^b

12.1±
2.86^a

0.08±
0.01^a

0.24±
0.07^a

0.05±
0.01^a

0.05±
0.02^a

12.7±
3.03^b

Sandy clay loam

4.73±
0.04^a

0.02±
0.00^a

8.73±
1.06^a

0.34±
0.04^a

23.2±
9.62^a

0.11±
0.02^a

0.10±
0.02^a

0.05±
0.01^a

0.06±
0.02^a

26.0±
2.22^a

Total

5.19±
0.09^a

0.02±
0.00^a

7.9±
0.99^b

0.30±
0.04^b

52.6±
12.7^a

0.17±
0.02^a

2.41±
0.45^a

0.48±
0.09^a

0.15±
0.03^a

23.1±
1.94^b

5.21±
0.08^a

0.03±
0.01^a

11.4±
1.17^a

0.43±
0.05^a

94.9±
20.5^a

0.27±
0.05^a

3.39±
0.70^a

0.53±
0.10^a

0.04±
0.01^b

30.8±
2.16^a

^zEC: Electric conductivity; ^yOM: Organic matter; ^xTN: Total nitrogen; ^wAvail. P₂O₅: Available phosphate; ^vCEC: Cation exchange capacity; ^uCultivation regions: PC (Pyeongchang), YW (Yeongwol), DY (Danyang), MK (Munkyeong), HY (Hamyang), SC (Sancheong).

^rValue in each column with different letters are statistically significant differences (p <0.05) among the treatments according to least significant difference (LSD).

Morphological characteristics

According to a survey on the growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng, rhizome length was recorded 9.7 ± 0.31 ~ 32.8 ± 0.65 ㎜. Length, diameter and dry weight of root were 16.7 ± 0.59 ~ 33.5 ± 3.39 ㎝, 7.50 ± 1.03 ~ 12.3 ± 0.67 ㎜, 7.50 ± 1.03 ~ 12.3 ± 0.67 ㎜, respectively. Cross-section area, surface area, volume of root were 9.7 ± 0.97 ~ 34.1 ± 5.28 ㎠, 30.6 ± 3.03 ~ 107.1 ± 16.6 ㎠, 1.21 ± 0.81 ~ 3.50 ± 0.33 ㎤, respectively (Table 2). Growth characteristics such as rhizome length, root length, root diameter, dry weight and volume were significantly higher in 13-year-old wild-simulated ginseng.

Table 2.

Growth characteristic according to age of wild-simulated ginseng in 6 different cultivation regions

Cultivation fields	Age	Growth characteristics
		Rhizome length	Root length	Root diameter	Dry weight of root	Cross-section area	Surface area	Volume
		(㎜)	(㎝)	(㎜)	(g)	(㎝²)	(㎝²)	(㎝³)
PC^z	7	20.3±1.98^by	22.8±1.99^a	7.50±1.03^a	0.97±0.14^b	18.6±3.59^a	58.4±11.3^a	1.65±0.28^b
PC^z	13	32.8±0.65^a	33.5±3.39^a	9.53±0.99^a	1.87±0.18^a	34.1±5.28^a	107.1±16.6^a	3.31±0.52^a
YW	7	18.0±2.12^a	23.2±2.17^a	8.7±0.45^a	0.90±0.10^a	22.3±5.18^a	70.1±16.3^a	2.11±0.57^a
YW	13	20.3±5.56^a	23.2±2.67^a	12.1±1.81^a	1.11±0.22^a	16.8±2.95^a	52.8±9.2^a	1.94±0.04^a
DY	7	17.8±1.86^a	17.2±2.18^a	10.9±1.29^a	1.13±0.21^a	15.6±1.12^a	49.1±3.51^a	1.56±0.10^a
DY	13	21.3±4.24^a	18.9±3.40^a	9.4±1.71^a	1.02±0.06^a	22.8±7.24^a	71.6±22.7^a	2.21±0.37^a
MK	7	19.9±6.13^a	18.6±2.21^b	11.7±1.10^a	1.21±0.08^a	22.9±4.08^a	72.1±12.8^a	2.33±0.28^a
MK	13	25.2±8.89^a	29.9±1.31^a	11.1±0.84^a	1.20±0.05^a	19.6±0.38^a	61.5±1.20^a	2.66±0.05^a
HY	7	17.8±0.97^a	18.9±1.51^a	9.3±0.69^a	1.04±0.10^b	25.2±3.33^a	79.2±10.4^a	2.26±0.25^a
HY	13	25.1±2.85^a	25.1±3.17^a	11.9±1.33^a	1.69±0.13^a	20.4±2.30^a	64.2±7.2^a	2.22±0.24^a
SC	7	9.7±0.31^b	16.7±0.59^a	10.4±1.19^a	0.79±0.09^b	9.7±0.97^b	30.6±3.03^b	1.21±0.18^b
SC	13	30.5±2.51^a	21.6±3.64^a	12.3±0.67^a	1.87±0.16^a	28.9±3.12^a	90.7±9.78^a	3.50±0.33^a
Total	7	15.6±1.55^b	19.6±0.89^b	9.8±0.48^a	1.01±0.05^b	19.1±1.72^a	59.9±5.40^a	1.86±0.15^b
Total	13	25.8±2.00^a	25.4±1.59^a	11.1±0.53^a	1.46±0.10^a	23.8±2.03^a	74.7±6.37^a	2.64±0.18^a

^zCultivation field: PC (Pyeongchang), YW (Yeongwol), DY (Danyang), MK (Munkyeong), HY (Hamyang), SC (Sancheong).

^yValue in each column with different letters are statistically significant differences (p <0.05) among the treatments according to least significant difference (LSD).

Ginsenoside contents

The HPLC-UV method was used for detecting 12 ginsenoside (G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg2, Rg3, Rh1, Rh2, F2) standards. Ginsenoside identities in the HPLC-UV chromatogram were confirmed by comparing retention times and UV spectra chromatograms of the peaks with those of the standards (Fig. 3). The analysis was conducted in triplicate and the results are shown in Table 3. Wild-simulated ginseng contained G-Rb1 at 0.91 ± 0.01 ~ 4.39 ± 0.16 ㎎/g, Rb2 at 3.80 ± 0.14 ~ 11.2 ± 0.33 ㎎/g, Rc at 1.15 ± 0.03 ~ 3.38 ± 0.13 ㎎/g, Rd at 0.55 ± 0.01 ~ 2.64 ± 0.11 ㎎/g, Re at 3.33 ± 0.06 ~ 6.86 ± 0.02 ㎎/g, Rf at 0.71 ± 0.01 ~ 2.02 ± 0.01 ㎎/g, Rg1 at 2.01 ± 0.04 ~ 6.46 ± 0.07 ㎎/g, Rg2 at 0.22 ± 0.01 ~ 0.72 ± 0.11 ㎎/g. In particular, G-Rb2, Re and Rg1 had high levels compared to the others. In contrast, G-Rg3 and Rh2 were not detected in any of the samples. According to the ginsenoside study based on the time of collection and cultivation conditions of mountain ginseng, it was reported that G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Re were mainly distributed (Chang, 1998; Nam, 1996). This study also confirmed that the results were consistent with previous studies because on the high content of Rb2, Re, and Rg1.

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjpr/2020-033-06/N0820330611/images/kjpr_33_06_11_F3.jpg

Fig. 3

HPLC chromatograms of ginsenosides in wild-simulated ginseng (A: 7-year-old, B: 13-year-old).

Table 3.

Ginsenoside content according to age of wild-simulated ginseng in 6 different cultivation regions

Cultivation
fields

Age

Content of ginsenosides

Rb1

Rb2

Rg1

Rg2

Rg3

Rh1

Rh2

F2(AS)

(㎎/g)

PC^z

2.93±
0.11^by

4.66±
0.04^b

2.55±
0.04^b

2.14±
0.08^b

3.33±
0.06^b

0.80±
0.01^b

3.18±
0.01^b

0.31±
0.00^b

ND^x

0.04±
0.00^a

0.04±
0.00^b

3.71±
0.08^a

6.89±
0.22^a

3.20±
0.06^a

2.53±
0.04^a

4.45±
0.07^a

1.11±
0.01^a

3.35±
0.03^a

0.40±
0.01^a

0.04±
0.00^a

0.06±
0.00^a

4.20±
0.19^a

5.77±
0.20^b

3.38±
0.13^a

2.64±
0.11^a

4.30±
0.02^b

0.89±
0.00^a

2.38±
0.04^b

0.50±
0.01^a

0.03±
0.00^b

0.05±
0.00^a

4.39±
0.16^a

8.70±
0.31^a

3.32±
0.11^a

1.83±
0.07^b

4.88±
0.06^a

1.53±
0.02^b

4.65±
0.05^a

0.32±
0.00^b

0.04±
0.00^a

0.06±
0.00^a

1.78±
0.11^a

3.80±
0.14^b

1.38±
0.06^b

1.06±
0.02^a

3.06±
0.02^b

0.71±
0.01^b

2.17±
0.03^b

0.31±
0.01^a

0.03±
0.00^b

0.06±
0.00

2.30±
0.16^a

6.71±
0.25^a

1.90±
0.09^a

0.55±
0.01^b

3.17±
0.05^a

1.46±
0.03^a

4.95±
0.03^a

0.22±
0.01^b

0.04±
0.00^a

1.31±
0.07^b

5.8±
0.10^b

1.74±
0.04^b

1.07±
0.08^b

4.68±
0.02^b

1.07±
0.02^b

2.86±
0.04^b

0.53±
0.01^b

0.04±
0.00^a

2.44±
0.10^a

11.2±
0.33^a

2.60±
0.11^a

1.37±
0.06^a

6.76±
0.06^a

2.02±
0.01^a

6.46±
0.07^a

0.71±
0.00^a

0.03±
0.00^a

1.02±
0.01^b

5.78±
0.03^b

1.34±
0.01^b

1.12±
0.01^b

6.33±
0.04^b

0.96±
0.01^b

2.01±
0.04^b

0.72±
0.01^a

0.03±
0.00

3.50±
0.09^a

8.29±
0.22^a

2.92±
0.09^a

1.28±
0.02^a

6.86±
0.02^a

1.32±
0.02^a

4.30±
0.12^a

0.44±
0.01^b

0.05±
0.00

0.91±
0.01^b

4.59±
0.14^b

1.15±
0.03^b

0.76±
0.03^a

4.15±
0.01^b

0.95±
0.02^b

2.96±
0.05^b

0.46±
0.00^b

0.02±
0.00^a

1.33±
0.03^a

7.84±
0.11^a

1.81±
0.05^a

0.85±
0.02^a

4.90±
0.13^a

1.03±0.01^a

3.61±0.03^a

0.48±
0.00^a

0.01±
0.00^b

Total

2.02±
0.29^b

5.07±
0.19^b

1.92±
0.19^b

1.47±
0.17^a

4.31±
0.26^b

0.90±
0.03^b

2.59±
0.11^b

0.47±
0.03^b

0.02±
0.00^a

0.04±
0.01^a

2.94±
0.25^a

8.27±
0.37^a

2.62±
0.15^a

1.40±
0.16^a

5.17±
0.32^a

1.41±
0.08^a

4.55±
0.25^a

0.43±
0.04^a

0.03±
0.00^a

0.03±
0.01^a

^zCultivation field: PC (Pyeongchang), YW (Yeongwol), DY (Danyang), MK (Munkyeong), HY (Hamyang), SC (Sancheong).

^yValue in each column with different letters are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments according to least significant difference (LSD).

^xND: not detected.

As for ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng, 13-year-old roots had significantly higher G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1 content compared to 7-year-old roots. In contrast, G-Rg2 was significantly higher in 7-year-old than 13-year-old. In another study based on the correlation between the ginsenoside contents and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng, 13-year-old roots were found to be higher in G-Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1 and Rg2 content compared to 7-year-old roots (Kim et al., 2020). Therefore, the chemical composition of ginsenosides of wild-simulated ginseng confirmed the results similar to those of previous studies.

Correlation between soil properties and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng

The results of correlation analysis between soil properties and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng are represented in Table 4. Among the soil properties, OM, TN and CEC were shown to have a significantly positive correlation with growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng. Soil organic matter had shown significant positive correlation with rhizome length (r = 0.495, p < 0.01), root length (r = 0.659, p < 0.01), root dry weight (r = 0.489, p < 0.01), cross-section area (r = 0.463, p < 0.01), surface area (r = 0.463, p < 0.01) and root volume (r = 0.468, p < 0.01) of wild-simulated ginseng. Soil total nitrogen content had shown significant positive correlation with rhizome length (r = 0.527, p < 0.01), root length (r = 0.660, p < 0.01), root dry weight (r = 0.509, p < 0.01), cross-section area (r = 0.466, p < 0.01), surface area (r = 0.466, p < 0.01) and root volume (r = 0.463, p < 0.01) of wild-simulated ginseng. In case of CEC, it had shown significant positive correlation with rhizome length (r = 0.488, p < 0.01), root length (r = 0.649, p < 0.01), root dry weight (r = 0.509, p < 0.01), cross-section area (r = 0.512, p < 0.01), surface area (r = 0.512, p < 0.01) and root volume (r = 0.521, p < 0.01) of wild-simulated ginseng. Soil organic matter and total nitrogen are essential nutrients during the growth of ginseng, and the organic matter content in the root layer of ginseng has correlation with the total nitrogen contents (Cheng et al., 2011). Kim et al. (2020) reported that the growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng had shown significant positive correlation with soil OM, TN and CEC. Hence, the previous studies support that the OM, TN and CEC have a significant correlation with growth of wild-simulated ginseng.

Table 4.

Correlation between soil properties and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng

Soil properties	Correlation coefficient (r)^z
	Growth characteristics
	Rhizome length	Root length	Root diameter	Dry weight of root	Cross-section area	Surface area	Volume
pH	0.105 (0.542)	-0.114 (0.509)	0.080 (0.644)	-0.127 (0.462)	-0.108 (0.529)	-0.108 (0.529)	-0.190 (0.267)
EC^y	0.355 (0.034)^*	0.238 (0.162)	0.141 (0.412)	0.416 (0.012)^*	0.208 (0.224)	0.208 (0.224)	0.238 (0.162)
OM^x	0.495 (0.002)^**	0.659 (0.000)^**	-0.160 (0.351)	0.489 (0.002)^**	0.463 (0.004)^**	0.463 (0.004)^**	0.468 (0.004)^**
TN^w	0.527 (0.001)^**	0.660 (0.000)^**	-0.152 (0.376)	0.509 (0.002)^**	0.466 (0.004)^**	0.466 (0.004)^**	0.463 (0.004)^**
Avail. P₂O₅^v	0.320 (0.057)	0.312 (0.064)	-0.011 (0.950)	0.113 (0.513)	0.175 (0.307)	0.175 (0.307)	0.187 (0.276)
K	0.309 (0.066)	0.436 (0.008)^**	-0.001 (0.994)	0.308 (0.068)	0.287 (0.089)	0.287 (0.089)	0.192 (0.262)
Ca	0.206 (0.227)	0.103 (0.551)	-0.032 (0.851)	0.202 (0.238)	0.087 (0.614)	0.087 (0.614)	-0.032 (0.853)
Mg	0.090 (0.600)	0.026 (0.879)	0.088 (0.608)	0.149 (0.385)	0.024 (0.887)	0.024 (0.887)	-0.085 (0.623)
Na	-0.365 (0.029)^*	-0.046 (0.789)	-0.148 (0.391)	-0.213 (0.213)	0.105 (0.543)	0.105 (0.543)	-0.025 (0.883)
CEC^u	0.488 (0.003)^**	0.649 (0.000)^**	-0.102 (0.552)	0.509 (0.002)^**	0.512 (0.001)^**	0.512 (0.001)^**	0.521 (0.001)^**

^zCorrelation coefficient (r) written are significantly correlated between the variables compared. Negative values denote negative correlation and positive values denote positive correlation. Values in bracket means p value (^**p < 0.01, ^*p < 0.05).

^yEC: Electric conductivity; ^xOM: Organic matter; ^wTN: Total nitrogen; ^vAvail. P₂O₅: Available phosphate; ^uCEC: Cation exchange capacity.

Correlation between growth characteristics and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng

The correlation analysis between growth characteristics and ginsenoside content of wild-simulated ginseng (7-year-old and 13-year-old) had shown a significant positive correlation (Table 5). Root length of wild-simulated ginseng had significant positive correlation with ginsenoside Rb1 (r = 0.491, p < 0.01), Rb2 (r = 0.507, p < 0.01), Rc (r = 0.611, p < 0.01), Rd (r = 0.502, p < 0.01), Rf (r = 0.383, p < 0.05) and Rg1 (r = 0.395, p < 0.05). Among the ginsenoside, Rb2 had shown significant positive correlation with rhizome length (r = 0.396, p < 0.05), root dry weight (r = 0.357, p < 0.05) and root volume (r = 0.467, p < 0.01). Kim et al. (2020) reported that the root length of wild-simulated ginseng has significant positive correlation with ginsenoside Rd and Rf. Alongside, ginsenoside Rb2 had shown significant positive correlation with root dry weight, cross-section area, surface area, volume of wild-simulated ginseng. Overall, soil OM, TN and CEC of the cultivated regions had a significantly positive correlation with the growth of wild-simulated ginseng. In addition, the root length of wild-simulated ginseng showed significant positive correlation with the content of ginsenoside.

Table 5.

Correlation between growth characteristics and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng

Ginsenoside	Correlation coefficient (r)^z
	Growth characteristics
	Rhizome length	Root length	Root diameter	Dry weight of root	Cross-section area	Surface area	Volume
Rb1	0.068 (0.694)	0.491 (0.002)^**	-0.102 (0.555)	0.128 (0.456)	0.115 (0.506)	0.115 (0.505)	0.083 (0.630)
Rb2	0.396 (0.017)^*	0.507 (0.002)^**	0.292 (0.084)	0.357 (0.032)^*	0.186 (0.277)	0.186 (0.278)	0.467 (0.004)^**
Rc	0.158 (0.359)	0.611 (0.000)^**	-0.064 (0.710)	0.241 (0.157)	0.215 (0.209)	0.215 (0.208)	0.242 (0.154)
Rd	-0.004 (0.980)	0.502 (0.002)^**	-0.305 (0.070)	0.072 (0.678)	0.214 (0.209)	0.215 (0.209)	0.115 (0.504)
Re	0.199 (0.245)	0.312 (0.064)	0.275 (0.105)	0.280 (0.098)	0.122 (0.478)	0.122 (0.478)	0.285 (0.092)
Rf	0.275 (0.104)	0.383 (0.021)^*	0.230 (0.178)	0.101 (0.556)	0.003 (0.986)	0.003 (0.986)	0.233 (0.172)
Rg1	0.324 (0.054)	0.395 (0.017)^*	0.192 (0.261)	0.147 (0.392)	-0.020 (0.910)	-0.020 (0.910)	0.221 (0.195)
Rg2	-0.016 (0.927)	0.124 (0.472)	0.106 (0.540)	0.033 (0.847)	0.107 (0.533)	0.107 (0.533)	0.228 (0.180)
Rh1	0.060 (0.727)	0.243 (0.154)	-0.169 (0.323)	0.113 (0.513)	0.081 (0.637)	0.082 (0.636)	-0.076 (0.661)
F2(AS)	-0.122 (0.478)	0.209 (0.221)	-0.099 (0.565)	-0.088 (0.609)	0.054 (0.752)	0.055 (0.751)	-0.030 (0.864)

These results showed that the growth and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng increased with the longer duration of cultivation time with additional characteristics of high soil OM, TN and CEC in cultivation regions. In addition, this study was able to investigate the correlation between growth and ginsenoside content of wild-simulated ginseng based on the soil characteristics of the cultivation regions.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the research of National Institute of Forest Science (NIFoS) (FP0802-2017-08).

References

Chang, H.K. 1998. Changes of saponin contents in Panax ginseng leaves by different harvesting months. Korean J. Food Nutr. 11:82-86 (in Korean).

Cheng, H.T., Y.Y. Zhang, L.X. Zhang, H. Sun and M. Gao. 2011. Changes of soil nutrients in ginseng under forest at different growth stages. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 27(8):47-52.

Jeong, B.G., G.R. Jung, M.S. Kim, H.G. Moon, S.J. Park and J. Chun. 2019. Ginsenoside contents and antioxidant activities of cultivated mountain ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) with different ages. Korean J. Food Preserv. 26(1):90-100 (in Korean). 10.11002/kjfp.2019.26.1.90

Kim, K., D. Jeong, H.J. Kim, K. Jeon, M. Kim and Y. Um. 2019a. A study on growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) by direct seeding and transplanting. Korean J. Plant Res. 32(2):160-169 (in Korean).

Kim, K., Y. Um, D.H. Jeong, H.J. Eo, K.S. Jeon and H.J. Kim. 2020. Effect of location environments on early growth of wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) seedlings in Larix kaempferi and mixed forest. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 109(3):313-324 (in Korean).

Kim, K., Y. Um, D.H. Jeong, H.J. Kim, M.J. Kim and K.S. Jeon. 2019b. Study on the correlation between the soil bacterial community and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer). Koean J. Environ. Biol. 37(3):380-388 (in Korean). 10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.3.380

Kim, K., Y. Um, D.H. Jeong, H.J. Kim, M.J. Kim and K.S. Jeon. 2019c. The correlation between growth characteristics and location environment of wild-simulated ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer). Korean J. Plant Res. 32(5):463-470 (in Korean).

Kim, K., Y. Um, H.J. Eo, H.W. Park, K.S. Jeon and H.J. Kim. 2020. Study on the correlation between the ginsenoside contents and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng with different year-roots (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer). Korean J. Plant Res. 33(4):255-262 (in Korean).

Korea Forest Service (KFS). 2019. The Industry Development Countermeasure of Wild-simulated Ginseng. Korea Forest Service. Daejeon, Korea.

Korea Forestry Promotion Institute (KOFPI). 2013. The Cultivation of Wild-simulated Ginseng: In Wild-simulated Ginseng and Cultural Environments. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute. Seoul, Korea. pp. 14-34.

Moon, H.K. 2015. Quality characteristics and anti-diabetic effect of mountain-cultivated ginseng (Sanyangsam). Department of Food Science and Technology, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyungpook National University, Korea. pp. 56-59.

Nam, K.Y. 1996. The New Korean Ginseng (Constituent and Its Pharmacological Efficacy). Korea Ginseng and Tabacco Research Institute. Daejeon, Korea. pp. 1-10.

National Institute of Forest Science (NIFoS). 2018. Standard Cultivation Manual of Wild-simulated Ginseng, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Korea.

RDA. 2013. Analysis Manual of Comprehensive Examination Laboratory (soil, plant, water and liquid manure). Rural development administration, Suwon, Korea. pp. 31-53.

Wisam, A.R.A., A.A. Fadhal, H.K. Jamal and H.H. Wurood. 2018. Study Physiology of Roots Growth for Soybean by WinRhizo Pro Software with Vam3 Genes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Promotion of Scientific & Regional Cooperation on Food and Agricultural Sciences. Mashhad, Iran. pp. 1-22.

Korean Journal of Plant Resources ISSN:1226-3591(Print) 2287-8203(Online) 한국자원식물학회지

Preview

The Comparative of Growth Characteristics and Ginsenoside Contents in Wild-simulated Ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) on Different Years by Soil Properties of Cultivation Regions

ABSTRACT

MAIN

Fig. 1

Morphology characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng. (1) 7-year-old, (2) 13-year-old, (3) morphological characteristics measured in the study (1-3 were cited from Kim et al., 2020).

Fig. 2

Chemical structures of portopanaxadiol (PPT) and protopanaxatriol (PPT)-type ginsenoside (Glc: β-D-glucopyranosyl, Arp: α-L-arabinopyranosyl, Araf: α-L-arabinofuranosyl, Rha: α-L-rhamnopyranosyl).

Table 1.

Soil chemical properties of 6 different cultivation regions according to age of wild-simulated ginseng

Table 2.

Growth characteristic according to age of wild-simulated ginseng in 6 different cultivation regions

Fig. 3

HPLC chromatograms of ginsenosides in wild-simulated ginseng (A: 7-year-old, B: 13-year-old).

Table 3.

Ginsenoside content according to age of wild-simulated ginseng in 6 different cultivation regions

Table 4.

Correlation between soil properties and growth characteristics of wild-simulated ginseng

Table 5.

Correlation between growth characteristics and ginsenoside contents of wild-simulated ginseng

Acknowledgements

References